[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1142C71C-32B8-4C34-BA3F-4D061BA25620@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:54:14 +0000
From: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Scheduler time extension
> On Mar 22, 2025, at 3:14 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:10:09 +0000
> Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> How do we proceed on this feature?
>> Are we leaning towards enabling this feature for SCHED_OTHER only under PREEMPT_LAZY?
>
> The merge window is about to open and I'm way behind in what needs to go in.
>
> Let's continue this discussion after rc1 comes out.
Can the API be finalized? We have an use case which will benefit from it. So like to see this feature
merged.
-Prakash.
>
> -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists