[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174435028421.31282.9864723186814628549.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:44:41 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Fernando Fernandez Mancera" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/urgent] x86/i8253: Call clockevent_i8253_disable() with
interrupts disabled
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 3940f5349b476197fb079c5aa19c9a988de64efb
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/3940f5349b476197fb079c5aa19c9a988de64efb
Author: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>
AuthorDate: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:23:03 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 07:28:20 +02:00
x86/i8253: Call clockevent_i8253_disable() with interrupts disabled
There's a lockdep false positive warning related to i8253_lock:
WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
...
systemd-sleep/3324 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
ffffffffb2c23398 (i8253_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: pcspkr_event+0x3f/0xe0 [pcspkr]
...
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2f0
_raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
clockevent_i8253_disable+0x1c/0x60
pit_timer_init+0x25/0x50
hpet_time_init+0x46/0x50
x86_late_time_init+0x1b/0x40
start_kernel+0x962/0xa00
x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
x86_64_start_kernel+0xed/0xf0
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
...
Lockdep complains due pit_timer_init() using the lock in an IRQ-unsafe
fashion, but it's a false positive, because there is no deadlock
possible at that point due to init ordering: at the point where
pit_timer_init() is called there is no other possible usage of
i8253_lock because the system is still in the very early boot stage
with no interrupts.
But in any case, pit_timer_init() should disable interrupts before
calling clockevent_i8253_disable() out of general principle, and to
keep lockdep working even in this scenario.
Use scoped_guard() for that, as suggested by Thomas Gleixner.
[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog. ]
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z-uwd4Bnn7FcCShX@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c
index 80e262b..cb9852a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ bool __init pit_timer_init(void)
* VMMs otherwise steal CPU time just to pointlessly waggle
* the (masked) IRQ.
*/
- clockevent_i8253_disable();
+ scoped_guard(irq)
+ clockevent_i8253_disable();
return false;
}
clockevent_i8253_init(true);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists