[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJy-Am=oORjnBx09phsBCkNxF+bK_CyWA_eBMHUG0WdE9pb63A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:58:45 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: alexs@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/isolation: clean up housekeeping_cpu
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> 于2025年4月10日周四 21:20写道:
>
> Le Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 05:24:17PM +0800, alexs@...nel.org a écrit :
> > From: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>
> >
> > housekeeping_test_cpu will check 'housekeeping_overridden' again in
> > itself so we don't need do it again outside. just call
> > housekeeping_test_cpu is fine.
>
> The point is to do it in the headers, so there is no function
> call in the off case.
Thanks for comments, Frederic,
But the function is 'inline', and further more, the
CONFIG_CPU_ISOLATION is in defconfig
and most of puplar popular Linux vendor. So it still be compiled.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists