[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e50249f-5184-46af-8daf-90d88b0a094e@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:50:21 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, "Arnd
Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Luke Wang
<ziniu.wang_1@....com>
CC: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...il.com>, Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>,
Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-mmc @ vger . kernel . org"
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, NXP S32 Linux Team <S32@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: esdhc-imx: convert to modern PM_OPS
On 11/04/25 08:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025, at 04:45, Bough Chen wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1586:13: error: unused function
>>> 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>> 1586 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1608:13: error: unused function
>>> 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>> 1608 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Remove the #ifdef checks and instead use the better macros that silently drop
>>> the unused functions when PM is disabled.
>>
>> Thanks for this catching.
>>
>> How about add __maybe_unused to define this tuning_save/retore function?
>
> That sounds counterproductive.
>
> The new macros were introduced to allow removing all the pointless
> __maybe_unused annotations, I see no reason to stick with the
> legacy helpers here.
>
> I did make a small mistake and ran into another warning later,
> but this fixup should address that:
>
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -2112,7 +2112,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sdhci_esdhc_imx_driver = {
> .name = "sdhci-esdhc-imx",
> .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> .of_match_table = imx_esdhc_dt_ids,
> - .pm = &sdhci_esdhc_pmops,
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&sdhci_esdhc_pmops),
> },
> .probe = sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe,
> .remove = sdhci_esdhc_imx_remove,
>
Can someone provide a Tested-by?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists