[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250411093741.1212-1-tanghuan@vivo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:37:41 +0800
From: Huan Tang <tanghuan@...o.com>
To: bvanassche@....org
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com,
beanhuo@...ron.com,
ebiggers@...gle.com,
keosung.park@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ssschuh.net,
luhongfei@...o.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com,
minwoo.im@...sung.com,
opensource.kernel@...o.com,
peter.wang@...iatek.com,
quic_cang@...cinc.com,
quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com,
quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com,
tanghuan@...o.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v10] ufs: core: Add WB buffer resize support
> Please remove this attribute again. I don't think that it is useful to
> make the value of wExtendedWriteBoosterSupport available in sysfs.
> Additionally, wExtendedWriteBoosterSupport is a bitfield and hence
> exporting it directly violates the sysfs one-value-per-attribute rule.
>
> Why "general_fail" instead of "general_failure"?
>
> A minor comment: please remove one tab in front of "=" for the value
> assignments in the above array definition.
>
> The formatting of the above code is not compliant with the Linux kernel
> coding style guide. Please reformat this patch, e.g. with "git
> clang-format HEAD^".
>
Hi bart sir,
Thank you for your reply and comments! I have modified it as follows:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250411092924.1116-1-tanghuan@vivo.com/
Best wishes to you !
Thanks
Huan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists