[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250411-mdb-gpiolib-setters-fix-v1-1-dea302ab7440@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:31:08 +0200
From: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: Allow to use setters with return value for
output-only gpios
The gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit() function checks if any setter
callback is present before doing anything. As the new GPIO setters with
return values were introduced, make this check also succeed if one is
present.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index b8197502a5ac..cd4fecbb41f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2879,7 +2879,7 @@ static int gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
* output-only, but if there is then not even a .set() operation it
* is pretty tricky to drive the output line.
*/
- if (!guard.gc->set && !guard.gc->direction_output) {
+ if (!guard.gc->set && !guard.gc->set_rv && !guard.gc->direction_output) {
gpiod_warn(desc,
"%s: missing set() and direction_output() operations\n",
__func__);
---
base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
change-id: 20250411-mdb-gpiolib-setters-fix-b87976992070
Best regards,
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists