lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250412110935.2267703-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:09:35 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: brauner@...nel.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	jack@...e.cz,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: improve codegen in link_path_walk()

Looking at the asm produced by gcc 13.3 for x86-64:
1. may_lookup() usage was not optimized for succeeding, despite the
   routine being inlined and rightfully starting with likely(!err)
2. the compiler assumed the path will have an indefinite amount of
   slashes to skip, after which the result will be an empty name

As such:
1. predict may_lookup() succeeding
2. check for one slash, no explicit predicts. do roll forward with
   skipping more slashes while predicting there is only one
3. predict the path to find was not a mere slash

This also has a side effect of shrinking the file:
add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 934/-1012 (-78)
Function                                     old     new   delta
link_path_walk                                 -     934    +934
path_parentat                                138     112     -26
path_openat                                 4864    4823     -41
path_lookupat                                418     374     -44
link_path_walk.part.constprop                901       -    -901
Total: Before=46639, After=46561, chg -0.17%

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
---

I'm looking at skipping perm checks with an "everybody can MAY_EXEC and
there are no acls" bit for opflags. This crapper is a side effect of
straighetning out the code before I get there.

 fs/namei.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 360a86ca1f02..40a636bbfa0c 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -2424,9 +2424,12 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 	nd->flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT;
 	if (IS_ERR(name))
 		return PTR_ERR(name);
-	while (*name=='/')
-		name++;
-	if (!*name) {
+	if (*name == '/') {
+		do {
+			name++;
+		} while (unlikely(*name == '/'));
+	}
+	if (unlikely(!*name)) {
 		nd->dir_mode = 0; // short-circuit the 'hardening' idiocy
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -2439,7 +2442,7 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 
 		idmap = mnt_idmap(nd->path.mnt);
 		err = may_lookup(idmap, nd);
-		if (err)
+		if (unlikely(err))
 			return err;
 
 		nd->last.name = name;
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ