[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250412180831.3252963-1-chenyuan0y@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:08:31 -0500
From: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
To: sudeep.holla@....com,
cristian.marussi@....com,
rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: Fix possible null pointer dereference
Check if policy is NULL before dereferencing it.
This is similar to the commit cf7de25878a1
("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference").
This is found by our static analysis tool KNighter.
Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")
---
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index c310aeebc8f3..ee916ce9b897 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -38,10 +38,14 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver;
static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
- struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
+ struct scmi_data *priv;
unsigned long rate;
int ret;
+ if (!policy)
+ return 0;
+ priv = policy->driver_data;
+
ret = perf_ops->freq_get(ph, priv->domain_id, &rate, false);
if (ret)
return 0;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists