[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250412181151.GA1417992-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:11:51 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, quic_vbadigan@...cnic.com,
amitk@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] PCI: PCI: Add pcie_link_is_active() to determine
if the PCIe link is active
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 07:19:56AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> Introduce a common API to check if the PCIe link is active, replacing
> duplicate code in multiple locations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h | 1 -
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 33 +++------------------------------
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/pci.h | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> index 273dd8c66f4eff8b62ab065cebf97db3c343977d..acef728530e36d6ea4d7db3afe97ed31b85be064 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ int pciehp_query_power_fault(struct controller *ctrl);
> int pciehp_card_present(struct controller *ctrl);
> int pciehp_card_present_or_link_active(struct controller *ctrl);
> int pciehp_check_link_status(struct controller *ctrl);
> -int pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl);
> void pciehp_release_ctrl(struct controller *ctrl);
>
> int pciehp_sysfs_enable_slot(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> index d603a7aa74838c748f6ac2d22ffb8b8cfe64e469..36468a9c31d669ec916e867ecfb7a8220cfab157 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ void pciehp_handle_disable_request(struct controller *ctrl)
>
> void pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(struct controller *ctrl, u32 events)
> {
> - int present, link_active;
> + bool link_active;
> + int present;
>
> /*
> * If the slot is on and presence or link has changed, turn it off.
> @@ -260,8 +261,8 @@ void pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(struct controller *ctrl, u32 events)
> /* Turn the slot on if it's occupied or link is up */
> mutex_lock(&ctrl->state_lock);
> present = pciehp_card_present(ctrl);
> - link_active = pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl);
> - if (present <= 0 && link_active <= 0) {
> + link_active = pcie_link_is_active(ctrl->pcie->port);
> + if (present <= 0 && !link_active) {
> if (ctrl->state == BLINKINGON_STATE) {
> ctrl->state = OFF_STATE;
> cancel_delayed_work(&ctrl->button_work);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 8a09fb6083e27669a12f1a3bb2a550369d471d16..278bc21d531dd20a38e06e5d33f5ccd18131c2c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -221,33 +221,6 @@ static void pcie_write_cmd_nowait(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd, u16 mask)
> pcie_do_write_cmd(ctrl, cmd, mask, false);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * pciehp_check_link_active() - Is the link active
> - * @ctrl: PCIe hotplug controller
> - *
> - * Check whether the downstream link is currently active. Note it is
> - * possible that the card is removed immediately after this so the
> - * caller may need to take it into account.
You've lost this somewhat important comment that still exists after this
patch.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists