lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8497954e-38de-43f5-b3e9-f354c308289e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:19:09 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
 Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
 "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "open list:I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
 "open list:AMD PMC DRIVER" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: Add AMD Zen debugging document



On 4/11/25 21:12, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 03:01:59PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> v3:
>>   * Move debugging.rst to index.rst
> 
> Do you plan to add more AMD-specific admin docs in the future?

I don't have any others planned right now.  That move was because I 
noticed a toc warning with how I had it structured before.

> (BTW, I don't
> follow v2 discussions.)

Don't worry; documentation hasn't been talked about in v2, it's all been 
discussion on the S5_RESET_STATUS.

> 
>> +As there are a lot of places that problems can occur, a debugging script has
>> +been created that can help test for common problems and offer suggestions.
>> +
>> +https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/amd-debug-tools.git/tree/amd_s2idle.py
>> +
>> +If you have an s2idle issue, it's best to start with this and follow instructions
>> +from its findings.  If you continue to have an issue, raise a bug with the
>> +report generated from this script.
> 
> To mailing list following Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst?

Actually I prefer them to drm/amd with the s2idle bug template.  I'll 
add this detail.

> 
>> +First convert the GPIO number into hex. ::
>> +
>> +  $ python3 -c "print(hex(59))"
>> +  0x3b
>> +
>> +Next determine which ACPI table has the ``_EVT`` entry. For example: ::
>> +
>> +  $ sudo grep EVT /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SSDT*
>> +  grep: /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SSDT27: binary file matches
>> +
>> +Decode this table:::
>> +
>> +  $ sudo cp /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SSDT27 .
>> +  $ sudo iasl -d SSDT27
> 
> Nit: two colons are sufficient for literal code-block.

Thanks.

> 
>> +To activate PM debugging, use the kernel command line option: ``pm_debug_messages``.
>> +
>> +Or enable the feature using the sysfs file: ``/sys/power/pm_debug_messages``
>> +Constraints that are not met will be displayed in the kernel log and can be
>> +viewed using anything that processes the kernel ring buffer such as ``dmesg``` or
>> +``journalctl``.
> 
> "To activate PM debugging, either specify ``pm_debug_messagess`` kernel
> command-line option at boot or write to ``/sys/power/pm_debug_messages``.
> Unmet constraints will be displayed in the kernel log and can be
> viewed by logging tools that process kernel ring buffer like dmesg or
> journalctl."
> 
>> +`patch <https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20250305051402.1550046-3-chiahsuan.chung@amd.com/T/#u>`_
> 
> What about that patchset status? It was not reviewed by upstream maintainers,
> right?
> 

At the time I wrote this document it wasn't yet merged.  It's been since 
merged, I will update to the commit details.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ