[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77f5e50c-ba52-42de-8668-e15660ba9eb3@amd.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:42:04 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti
<mtosatti@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Valentin
Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work
On 4/11/2025 3:55 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>> + if (task_work_queued(¤t->nohz_full_work)) {
>> + ret = 0;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = task_work_add(current, ¤t->nohz_full_work, TWA_RESUME);
>> +out:
>> + local_irq_restore(flags);
>> + return ret;
>
> Hmm, why not
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> if (task_work_queued(...))
> ret = 0;
> else
> ret = task_work_add(...);
>
> ?
Or use guard() sand save on flags and ret:
guard(irqsave)();
if (task_work_queued(...))
return 0;
return task_work_add(...);
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
>
> Oleg.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists