[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZRTfZggPp395Y-ZJ6DkHFdorvjX-MiFHxR40UGU+3rSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:28:03 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: core/urgent] compiler.h: Avoid the usage of
__typeof_unqual__() when __GENKSYMS__ is defined
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 9:20 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > > If this commit is removed, [...]
> > >
> > > I did not remove commit ac053946f5c4, it's already upstream. Nor
> > > did I advocate for it to be reverted - I'd like it to be fixed. So
> > > you are barking up the wrong tree.
> >
> > If the intention is to pass my proposed workaround via Andrew's tree,
> > then I'm happy to bark up the wrong tree, but from the referred
> > message trail, I didn't get the clear decision about the patch, and
> > neither am sure which patch "brown paper bag bug" refers to.
>
> It's up to akpm (he merged your original patch that regressed), but I
> think scripts/genksyms/ should be fixed instead of worked around -
> which is why I zapped the workaround.
As said earlier, I have tried to fix genksyms, but the simple fix was
not enough. The correct fix would be somehow more involved, and I have
zero experience in genksyms source. I'm afraid I don't know this
source well enough to offer a fix in the foreseeable future, so I
resorted to the workaround (which at the end of the day is as
effective as the real fix).
Regards,
Uros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists