[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250413014444.36724-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 09:44:44 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] ftrace: fix incorrect hash size in register_ftrace_direct()
The maximum of the ftrace hash bits is made fls(32) in
register_ftrace_direct(), which seems illogical. So, we fix it by making
the max hash bits FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS instead.
Fixes: d05cb470663a ("ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
---
v2:
- thanks for Steven's advice, we fix the problem by making the max hash
bits FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS instead.
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 1a48aedb5255..d153ad13e0e0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -5914,9 +5914,10 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
/* Make a copy hash to place the new and the old entries in */
size = hash->count + direct_functions->count;
- if (size > 32)
- size = 32;
- new_hash = alloc_ftrace_hash(fls(size));
+ size = fls(size);
+ if (size > FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS)
+ size = FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS;
+ new_hash = alloc_ftrace_hash(size);
if (!new_hash)
goto out_unlock;
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists