lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174463900319.86688.13547575756527850636.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:56:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, davidgow@...gle.com, rmoar@...gle.com, 
 npache@...hat.com, Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix up building KUnit tests for Cirrus Logic
 modules

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:36:05 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> This series fixes the KConfig for cs_dsp and cs-amp-lib tests so that
> CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS doesn't cause them to add modules to the build.
> 
> Patch 1 adds the ASoC CS35L56 driver to KUnit all_tests.config so that
>         cs_dsp and cs-amp-lib will be included in the test build.
> 
> Patch 2 and 3 fixup the KConfig entries for cs_dsp and cs-amp-lib.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] kunit: configs: Add some Cirrus Logic modules to all_tests
      commit: 1aa495a6572f8641da4ec4cd32210deca61bed64
[2/3] ASoC: cs-amp-lib-test: Don't select SND_SOC_CS_AMP_LIB
      commit: 96014d91cffb335d3b396771524ff2aba3549865
[3/3] firmware: cs_dsp: tests: Depend on FW_CS_DSP rather then enabling it
      commit: a0b887f6eb9a0d1be3c57d00b0f3ba8408d3018a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ