[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS4PR04MB969222D99D16088825C1A8D5E7B32@AS4PR04MB9692.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:25:27 +0000
From: Neeraj Sanjay Kale <neeraj.sanjaykale@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>, "luiz.dentz@...il.com"
<luiz.dentz@...il.com>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Amitkumar Karwar
<amitkumar.karwar@....com>, Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, Manjeet Gupta
<manjeet.gupta@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: nxp: Add
support for host-wakeup
Hi Rob,
Thank you for reviewing this patch.
I have sent out a v2 patch with bindings containing interrupt and wakeup-source.
I am not sure if I should mention the "wakeup-source" property, as this already has a property called "interrupt-names" with value "wakeup".
Please help me suggest if I should remove the "wakeup-source" property.
Thanks,
Neeraj
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:07:18PM +0530, Neeraj Sanjay Kale wrote:
> > Add support for host-wakeup on GPIO interrupt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neeraj Sanjay Kale <neeraj.sanjaykale@....com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/nxp,88w8987-bt.yaml | 7
> > +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/nxp,88w8987-bt.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/nxp,88w8987-bt.yaml
> > index d02e9dd847ef..ab1411c05f49 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/nxp,88w8987-bt.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/nxp,88w8987-bt.y
> > +++ aml
> > @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ properties:
> > description:
> > The GPIO number of the NXP chipset used for BT_WAKE_IN.
> >
> > + host-wakeup-gpios:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > + description:
> > + Host wakeup by falling edge interrupt on this GPIO which
> > + is connected to BT_WAKE_OUT pin of the NXP chipset.
>
> Read the description in the Broadcom binding you copied this from.
> Define this as an interrupt named 'wakeup', not a GPIO. After all, to be a
> wake-up source, it kind of has to be an interrupt.
>
> Just because I said no to putting wakeup source handling in serdev, doesn't
> mean the binding should change. The handling just has to be in the driver.
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists