[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250414060055.341516-7-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:00:53 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: aeh@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
jhs@...atatu.com,
kernel-team@...a.com,
Erik Lundgren <elundgren@...a.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/8] rcuscale: Allow rcu_scale_ops::get_gp_seq to be NULL
For synchronization mechanisms similar to RCU, there could be no "grace
period" concept (e.g. hazard pointers), therefore allow
rcu_scale_ops::get_gp_seq to be a NULL pointer for these cases, and
simply treat started and finished grace period as 0.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
index 0f3059b1b80d..d9bff4b1928b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
@@ -568,8 +568,10 @@ rcu_scale_writer(void *arg)
if (gp_exp) {
b_rcu_gp_test_started =
cur_ops->exp_completed() / 2;
- } else {
+ } else if (cur_ops->get_gp_seq) {
b_rcu_gp_test_started = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
+ } else {
+ b_rcu_gp_test_started = 0;
}
}
@@ -625,9 +627,11 @@ rcu_scale_writer(void *arg)
if (gp_exp) {
b_rcu_gp_test_finished =
cur_ops->exp_completed() / 2;
- } else {
+ } else if (cur_ops->get_gp_seq) {
b_rcu_gp_test_finished =
cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
+ } else {
+ b_rcu_gp_test_finished = 0;
}
if (shutdown) {
smp_mb(); /* Assign before wake. */
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists