[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250414-tintenfleck-planbar-656144f25a3b@brauner>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 21:45:47 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] release_task: kill the no longer needed
get/put_pid(thread_pid)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 09:39:47PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:18:57PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > After the commit 7903f907a2260 ("pid: perform free_pid() calls outside
> > of tasklist_lock") __unhash_process() -> detach_pid() no longer calls
> > free_pid(), proc_flush_pid() can just use p->thread_pid without the
> > now pointless get_pid() + put_pid().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/exit.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> > index 1b51dc099f1e..96d639383f86 100644
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > struct release_task_post post;
> > struct task_struct *leader;
> > - struct pid *thread_pid;
> > int zap_leader;
> > repeat:
> > memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post));
> > @@ -253,8 +252,6 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
> > pidfs_exit(p);
> > cgroup_release(p);
> >
> > - thread_pid = get_pid(p->thread_pid);
> > -
> > write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > ptrace_release_task(p);
> > __exit_signal(&post, p);
> > @@ -282,8 +279,8 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
> > }
> >
> > write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > - proc_flush_pid(thread_pid);
> > - put_pid(thread_pid);
> > + /* p->thread_pid can't go away until free_pids() below */
> > + proc_flush_pid(p->thread_pid);
>
> This cannot work though, right?
> Because after __unhash_process() p->thread_pid may be NULL:
>
> __unhash_process()
> -> detach_pid()
> -> __change_pid()
> {
> struct pid **pid_ptr, *pid;
>
> pid_ptr = task_pid_ptr(task, type);
>
> *pid_ptr = NULL;
>
> for (tmp = PIDTYPE_MAX; --tmp >= 0; )
> if (pid_has_task(pid, tmp)) /* will be false if @group_dead is true
> return;
>
> WARN_ON(pids[type]);
> pids[type] = pid;
> }
>
> so this needs:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index e6132ebdaed4..9232c4c684e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct release_task_post post;
> struct task_struct *leader;
> + struct pid *thread_pid = task_pid(p);
> int zap_leader;
> repeat:
> memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post));
> @@ -285,7 +286,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
>
> write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> /* p->thread_pid can't go away until free_pids() below */
> - proc_flush_pid(p->thread_pid);
> + proc_flush_pid(thread_pid);
> add_device_randomness(&p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
> sizeof(p->se.sum_exec_runtime));
> free_pids(post.pids);
>
> I've folded this diff into your patch, Oleg. Let me know if you see any
> additional issues with this.
The task_pid() needs to be moved after the repeat label. I'm appending
the full patch I applied.
View attachment "0001-release_task-kill-the-no-longer-needed-get-put_pid-t.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1540 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists