| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2820908b-4548-4e0a-94b2-6065cb5ff1f3@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:04:15 +0530
From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <bjorande@...cinc.com>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
<quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/9] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset
On 4/11/2025 4:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 13:50, Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2025 1:38 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 02:30:57PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>>>> Refactor the UFS PHY reset handling to parse the reset logic only once
>>>> during probe, instead of every resume.
>>>>
>>>> Move the UFS PHY reset parsing logic from qmp_phy_power_on to
>>>> qmp_ufs_probe to avoid unnecessary parsing during resume.
>>>
>>> How did you solve the circular dependency issue being noted below?
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>> As part of my patch, I moved the parsing logic from qmp_phy_power_on to
>> qmp_ufs_probe to avoid unnecessary parsing during resume. I'm uncertain
>> about the circular dependency issue and whether if it still exists.
>
> It surely does. The reset controller is registered in the beginning of
> ufs_qcom_init() and the PHY is acquired only a few lines below. It
> creates a very small window for PHY driver to probe.
> Which means, NAK, this patch doesn't look acceptable.
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for pointing this out. I agree that it leaves very little time
for the PHY to probe, which may cause issues with targets where
no_pcs_sw_reset is set to true.
As an experiment, I kept no_pcs_sw_reset set to true for the SM8750, and
it caused bootup probe issues in some of the iterations I ran.
To address this, I propose updating the patch to move the
qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset call to phy_calibrate, just before the
reset_control_assert call.
This change will delay the UFS PHY reset as much as possible in the
code. Additionally, moving it from phy_power_on to calibrate will ensure
that qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset is called only once during boot, rather than
during each phy_power_on call.
Please let me know your thoughts.
=====================================================================================================
static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
{
struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
@@ -1793,6 +1826,12 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
unsigned int val;
int ret;
+ pr_err("%s %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+
+ ret = qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(qmp);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1817,7 +1856,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
dev_err(qmp->dev, "phy initialization timed-out\n");
return ret;
=====================================================================================================
Regards.
Nitin
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nitin
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 61 +++++++++++++------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>> index 636dc3dc3ea8..12dad28cc1bd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>>>> @@ -1799,38 +1799,11 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
>>>> static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>>>> {
>>>> struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>>>> - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> dev_vdbg(qmp->dev, "Initializing QMP phy\n");
>>>>
>>>> - if (cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a
>>>> - * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY
>>>> - * needs this UFS reset.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (!qmp->ufs_reset) {
>>>> - qmp->ufs_reset =
>>>> - devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev,
>>>> - "ufsphy");
>>>> -
>>>> - if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) {
>>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset);
>>>> - dev_err(qmp->dev,
>>>> - "failed to get UFS reset: %d\n",
>>>> - ret);
>>>> -
>>>> - qmp->ufs_reset = NULL;
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> - }
>>>> - }
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> ret = qmp_ufs_com_init(qmp);
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> -
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
>>>> @@ -2088,6 +2061,34 @@ static int qmp_ufs_parse_dt(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a
>>>> + * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY
>>>> + * needs this UFS reset.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!qmp->ufs_reset) {
>>>> + qmp->ufs_reset =
>>>> + devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, "ufsphy");
>>>
>>> Strange indentation.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) {
>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset);
>>>> + dev_err(qmp->dev, "failed to get PHY reset: %d\n", ret);
>>>> + qmp->ufs_reset = NULL;
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> @@ -2114,6 +2115,10 @@ static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> return ret;
>>>>
>>>> + ret = qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(qmp);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Check for legacy binding with child node. */
>>>> np = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, NULL);
>>>> if (np) {
>>>> --
>>>> 2.48.1
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists