linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add support for adc102s021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <022605b1-dd61-467d-85f3-ec60a8d1da8f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:15:44 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
 Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@...libre.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@...il.com>,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add support for adc102s021

On 12/04/2025 16:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue,  8 Apr 2025 06:21:18 -0700
> Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@...libre.com> wrote:
> 
>> The patch series adds the support for adc102s021 and family.
>>
>> The family of devices are easier to
>> support since they all (no matter the resolution) seem to respond in
>> 12-bits with the LSBs set to 0 for the reduced resolution devices.
> 
> This has raced against Matti's series
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/cover.1744022065.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
> Support ROHM BD79104 ADC
> 
> With hindsight that wasn't obvious from the patch series name though
> which should ideally have been
> iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Support ROHM BD79104 ADC

Oh, right. Sorry about that!

> Please rebase on the iio testing branch on kernel.org or on top of that series.
> Technically I've only applied the first 7 patches so far, but the 8th
> should be a simple change from that v3.

I can also rebase the 8th on top of these changes if these get in before 
I rework the 8th.

> Matti, you volunteered as maintainer :)  Hence please take a look at
> this one.

Sure. Thanks for CC'ing me. I didn't have this driver included in my 
mail filters yet.

Yours,
	-- Matti