lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_yrjPBO_CPS8WX1@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:30:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: simplify code in fetch_item()

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 03:24:51PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 08:42:36AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

...

> Getting rid of the unreachable() in some way resolves the issue. I
> tested using BUG() in lieu of unreachable() like the second change I
> mentioned above, which resolves the issue cleanly, as the default case
> clearly cannot happen. ...

As Dmitry pointed out to this old discussion, I have a question about the above
test. Have you tried to use BUG() while CONFIG_BUG=n? Does it _also_ solve the
issue?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ