linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA and HIGH_SPEED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250414065119.GA6309@francesco-nb>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:51:19 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
Cc: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@...il.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Moteen Shah <m-shah@...com>,
	Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA and HIGH_SPEED_ENA

Hello Judith

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:55:39PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
> My understanding was that we do not like adding new DT properties if
> we can find a way to apply the quirk in the driver.
...

> If this implementation flies with the maintainers, then we can go back to DT
> property implementation.

Not sure if this is clear, but this patch is NOT working according to
our tests, we would need to fix it in a different way.

Francesco

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>