[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e65414bf-acd6-4e47-bbab-d47e0ff81651@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:33:43 +0530
From: Ayushi Makhija <quic_amakhija@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <sean@...rly.run>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
<rfoss@...nel.org>, <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
<jonas@...boo.se>, <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
<quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <quic_rajeevny@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] dt-bindings: display: msm: document DSI
controller and phy on SA8775P
Hi Krzysztof/Dmitry,
On 4/10/2025 2:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 08:08:17AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/04/2025 17:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2025 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 08/04/2025 22:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> + - const: qcom,sa8775p-dsi-ctrl
>>>>>>>>>>> + - const: qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Drop fallback
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I couldn't understand the meaning of "Drop fallback", could please elaborate it ?
>>>>>>>> Look at SM8750 example on the lists. Keep only front compatible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To make things simpler and shorter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd prefer consistency. Previous platforms use qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl.
>>>> Then you should have objected month(s) ago when Rob asked for dropping
>>>> fallback and since then we consistently drop it.
>>>
>>> Well... It's still not merged. is it?
>>> For SM8750 it kinda makes sense, because the clock handling is different
>>> from all other current platforms. For the existing devices... I'm not
>>> that sure.
>> How does it differ? The clock handling does not matter - this is just
>> select of schema for the child node.
>
> Ah.... I'm sorry, I misinterpreted the email. Yes, having only a single
> compat here is perfectly fine. Please excuse me for the confusion.
>
Thanks, for the review.
I will write single compatible string. Will update it in next patchset.
+ "^dsi@[0-9a-f]+$":
+ type: object
+ additionalProperties: true
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: qcom,sa8775p-dsi-ctrl
+
Thanks,
Ayushi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists