[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250414-ebony-slug-of-felicity-421b0f@sudeepholla>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:17:34 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] firmware: imx: Add i.MX95 SCMI LMM driver
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:00:20AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>
> Oops, I just checked wrong Kconfig under drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/
> vendors/imx
>
> Build this for ARM32 i.MX is ok, I just think no need. So add
> a ARM64 dependency.
>
OK, I will drop the ARM64 dependency when applying. I also don't understand
the dependency on i.MX firmware LMM and CPU drivers in the scmi vendor
protocol as the dependency should be other way around. But I see Arnd had
fixed it so I will keep it as you have posted to keep them all aligned.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists