[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e08b7127-4f9b-433e-b0f3-e2c4ef279b78@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:20:04 +0530
From: Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@...com>
To: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>
CC: <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <vaishnav.a@...com>, <jai.luthra@...ux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: dts: ti: j721e-sk: Add DT nodes for power
regulators
Hi Udit,
On 11/04/25 19:04, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>
> On 4/9/2025 7:11 PM, Yemike Abhilash Chandra wrote:
>> Add device tree nodes for two power regulators on the J721E SK board.
>> vsys_5v0: A fixed regulator representing the 5V supply output from the
>> LM61460 and vdd_sd_dv: A GPIO-controlled TLV71033 regulator.
>>
>> J721E-SK schematics: https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/sprr438
>> Fixes: 1bfda92a3a36 ("arm64: dts: ti: Add support for J721E SK")
>
> For me does not looks like a fix, you can adding missing nodes
>
Since we are adding the regulator nodes in the sensor overlay, (Patch 4
of this series) which in turn references these regulator nodes, I have
included the Fixes tag in this patch as well.
>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@...com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
>> index 440ef57be294..4965957e6545 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-sk.dts
>> @@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ vsys_3v3: fixedregulator-vsys3v3 {
>> regulator-boot-on;
>> };
>> + vsys_5v0: fixedregulator-vsys5v0 {
>> + /* Output of LM61460 */
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vsys_5v0";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + vin-supply = <&vusb_main>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> vdd_mmc1: fixedregulator-sd {
>> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> @@ -211,6 +222,20 @@ vdd_sd_dv_alt: gpio-regulator-tps659411 {
>> <3300000 0x1>;
>> };
>> + vdd_sd_dv: gpio-regulator-TLV71033 {
>> + compatible = "regulator-gpio";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vdd_sd_dv_pins_default>;
>> + regulator-name = "tlv71033";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + vin-supply = <&vsys_5v0>;
>> + gpios = <&main_gpio0 118 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + states = <1800000 0x0>,
>> + <3300000 0x1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> transceiver1: can-phy1 {
>> compatible = "ti,tcan1042";
>> #phy-cells = <0>;
>> @@ -613,6 +638,12 @@ J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0xd4, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* (G26)
>> WKUP_GPIO0_9 */
>> >;
>> };
>> + vdd_sd_dv_pins_default: vdd-sd-dv-default-pins {
>> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> + J721E_IOPAD(0x1dc, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (Y1)
>> SPI1_CLK.GPIO0_118 */
>
> Shouldn't be this pin be output to control regulator ?
>
Yes, I will correct this in the next revision.
Thanks and Regards
Yemike Abhilash Chandra
>
>> + >;
>> + };
>> +
>> wkup_uart0_pins_default: wkup-uart0-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0xa0, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (J29)
>> WKUP_UART0_RXD */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists