| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250415124928.14372-1-charlie910417@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:49:28 +0800 From: Po-Ying Chiu <charlie910417@...il.com> To: dsterba@...e.cz Cc: beckerlee3@...il.com, charlie910417@...il.com, dsterba@...e.com, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, wqu@...e.com Subject: [PATCH v2] rbtree: Fix typo in header comment Correct "drammatically" to "dramatically" in the rbtree.h header comment. This improves the readability of the header comment. Signed-off-by: Po-Ying Chiu <charlie910417@...il.com> --- Changes since v1: * Rephrased the whole paragraph to imporve readability. include/linux/rbtree.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree.h b/include/linux/rbtree.h index 8d2ba3749866..02b6733cce55 100644 --- a/include/linux/rbtree.h +++ b/include/linux/rbtree.h @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ linux/include/linux/rbtree.h - To use rbtrees you'll have to implement your own insert and search cores. - This will avoid us to use callbacks and to drop drammatically performances. - I know it's not the cleaner way, but in C (not in C++) to get - performances and genericity... + To use rbtrees, you'll have to implement your own insert and search cores. + This avoids the need for callbacks, which would otherwise significantly reduce performance. + It may not be the cleanest approach, but in C (as opposed to C++), it is often + necessary to achieve both performance and genericity. See Documentation/core-api/rbtree.rst for documentation and samples. */ -- 2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists