lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025041528-garment-senior-1c71@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:09:05 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andrey Tsygunka <aitsygunka@...dex.ru>
Cc: markus.elfring@....de, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] misc: sram: Fix NULL pointer dereference in sram_probe

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 05:34:42PM +0300, Andrey Tsygunka wrote:
> Add a check for the return value from platform_get_resource() call
> to be NULL.
> 
> If the passed device-tree contains a node for sram-device
> without a specified '<reg>' property value, for example:
> 
>     sram: sram@...000000 {
>         compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-sysram";
>     };
> 
> and the of_device_id[] '.data' element contains a sram_config*
> with '.map_only_reserved = true' property, we get the error:
> 
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
> Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.96 #1
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> Call trace:
>   sram_probe+0x134/0xd30
>   platform_probe+0x94/0x130
>   really_probe+0x124/0x580
>   __driver_probe_device+0xd0/0x1f0
>   driver_probe_device+0x50/0x1c0
>   __device_attach_driver+0x140/0x220
>   bus_for_each_drv+0xbc/0x130
>   __device_attach+0xec/0x2c0
>   device_initial_probe+0x24/0x40
>   bus_probe_device+0xd8/0xe0
>   device_add+0x67c/0xc80
>   of_device_add+0x58/0x80
>   of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xd0/0x1b0
>   of_platform_bus_create+0x27c/0x6f0
>   of_platform_populate+0xac/0x1d0
>   of_platform_default_populate_init+0x10c/0x130
>   do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x510
>   kernel_init_freeable+0x43c/0x4d8
>   kernel_init+0x2c/0x1e0
>   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> 
> Fixes: 444b0111f3bc ("misc: sram: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource_wc()")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Tsygunka <aitsygunka@...dex.ru>
> ---
> v2: Description changed based on comments from Markus Elfring 
> at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/84969aba-67ba-4990-9065-6b55ce26ff92@web.de/,
> added tag 'Fixes', removed useless information from backtrace.
> 
>  drivers/misc/sram.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> index e5069882457e..c8ba8ebd4364 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> @@ -410,8 +410,13 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(clk))
>  		return PTR_ERR(clk);
>  
> -	ret = sram_reserve_regions(sram,
> -			platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0));
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (unlikely(res == NULL)) {

Only use likely/unlikely if you can actually benchmark the difference.
For probe() callbacks, that is never the case, so just rely on the
compiler and cpu to get it right (hint, it almost always will.)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ