[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3acd53796a44576408a2a14aa5baaed@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:11:11 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
<dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Jonathan
Corbet <corbet@....net>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, Roger Quadros
<rogerq@...nel.org>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...tq-group.com, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] checkpatch: check for comment explaining
rgmii(|-rxid|-txid) PHY modes
On 2025-04-15 03:18, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> Historially, the RGMII PHY modes specified in Device Trees have been
> used inconsistently, often referring to the usage of delays on the PHY
> side rather than describing the board; many drivers still implement
> this
> incorrectly.
>
> Require a comment in Devices Trees using these modes (usually
> mentioning
> that the delay is relalized
realized
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 784912f570e9d..57fcbd4b63ede 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3735,6 +3735,17 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
> +# Check for RGMII phy-mode with delay on PCB
> + if ($realfile =~ /\.dtsi?$/ && $line =~
> /^\+\s*(phy-mode|phy-connection-type)\s*=\s*"/ &&
> + !ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
Not sure where $first_line comes from and unsure if this works on
patches rather than complete files.
Does it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists