[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37400faf-8d31-44ef-b9d1-6c91fa19b4f3@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:59:36 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] rcutorture: Add tests for SRCU up/down reader
primitives
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:16:15PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> On 3/31/2025 5:03 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit adds a new rcutorture.n_up_down kernel boot parameter
> > that specifies the number of outstanding SRCU up/down readers, which
> > begin in kthread context and end in an hrtimer handler. There is a new
> > kthread ("rcu_torture_updown") that scans an per-reader array looking
> > for elements whose readers have ended. This kthread sleeps between one
> > and two milliseconds between consecutive scans.
> >
> > [ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]
> > [ paulmck: Apply Z qiang feedback. ]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> For completeness, posting our discussion for the archives, an issue exists in
> this patch causing the following errors on an ARM64 machine with 288 CPUs:
>
> When running SRCU-P test, we intermittently see:
>
> [ 9500.806108] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_SYNC(21) g18446744073709551218 f0x0
> ->state 0x2 cpu 4
> [ 9515.833356] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_SYNC(21) g18446744073709551218 f0x0
> ->state 0x2 cpu 4
>
> It bisected to just this patch.
Looks like your getting rcutorture running on ARM was well timed!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists