[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250415180058.GM16750@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:00:58 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
Cc: clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix the incorrect description in comments.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 05:07:22PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> Replace PTR_ERR(-ENOMEM) to ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) in comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> index 3f1551d8a5c6..e35626270f2b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_delayed_node(
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -/* Will return either the node or PTR_ERR(-ENOMEM) */
> +/* Will return either the node or ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) */
Thanks, while this is correct it would be better to update the whole
function comment so it's more descriptive. I'll write someting when
adding the patch to for-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists