linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/8] ref_tracker: don't use %pK in pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250415-reftrack-dbgfs-v2-1-b18c4abd122f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:49:39 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, 
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] ref_tracker: don't use %pK in pr_ostream() output

As Thomas Weißschuh points out [1], it is now preferable to use %p
instead of hashed pointers with printk(), since raw pointers should no
longer be leaked into the kernel log. Change the ref_tracker
infrastructure to use %p instead of %pK in its formats.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250414-restricted-pointers-net-v1-0-12af0ce46cdd@linutronix.de/

Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
 lib/ref_tracker.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ref_tracker.c b/lib/ref_tracker.c
index cf5609b1ca79361763abe5a3a98484a3ee591ff2..de71439e12a3bab6456910986fa611dfbdd97980 100644
--- a/lib/ref_tracker.c
+++ b/lib/ref_tracker.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ __ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,

 	stats = ref_tracker_get_stats(dir, display_limit);
 	if (IS_ERR(stats)) {
-		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%pK: couldn't get stats, error %pe\n",
+		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%p: couldn't get stats, error %pe\n",
 			   dir->name, dir, stats);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ __ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
 		stack = stats->stacks[i].stack_handle;
 		if (sbuf && !stack_depot_snprint(stack, sbuf, STACK_BUF_SIZE, 4))
 			sbuf[0] = 0;
-		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%pK has %d/%d users at\n%s\n", dir->name, dir,
+		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%p has %d/%d users at\n%s\n", dir->name, dir,
 			   stats->stacks[i].count, stats->total, sbuf);
 		skipped -= stats->stacks[i].count;
 	}

 	if (skipped)
-		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%pK skipped reports about %d/%d users.\n",
+		pr_ostream(s, "%s@%p skipped reports about %d/%d users.\n",
 			   dir->name, dir, skipped, stats->total);

 	kfree(sbuf);

-- 
2.49.0