[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ae769fc0f9f4c26a26f3fb2233ee025@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:57:17 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
Ping-Ke Shih
<pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>,
kernel test robot
<lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] rtase: Fix kernel test robot issue
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:36:45PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> > 1. Fix the compile error reported by the kernel test robot by modifying
> > the condition used to detect overflow in rtase_calc_time_mitigation.
> > 2. Fix the compile warning reported by the kernel test robot by
> > increasing the size of ivec->name.
> > 3. Fix a type error in min_t.
>
> Looks like three patches should be used, not one. You can then include
> the details of what the test robot reported making it easier to
> understand each fix.
>
>
> Andrew
>
> ---
> pw-bot: cr
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for your response. I will split this patch into three
separate patches and include the detailed report from the kernel
test robot.
Thanks,
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists