[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_4gb8ZAlbfhobgW@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:01:35 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: rust: add creation of workqueues
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:15:41PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 03:34:24PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> >
> > +/// An owned kernel work queue.
>
> I'd suggest to document that dropping an OwnedQueue will wait for pending work.
>
> Additionally, given that you're about to implement delayed work as well, we
> should also mention that destroy_workqueue() currently does not cover waiting
> for delayed work *before* it is scheduled and hence may cause WARN() splats or
> even UAF bugs.
Ah, that's a problem :(
Can we make destroy_workqueue() wait for delayed items too? And/or have
a variant of it that does so? I'm not sure what is best to do here...
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists