linux-kernel - Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/edid: Implement DisplayID Type IX & X timing blocks parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87jz7lss4n.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:15:04 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Egor Vorontsov <sdoregor@...re.me>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Maarten Lankhorst
 <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Egor Vorontsov
 <sdoregor@...re.me>
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for series starting
 with [v3,1/2]
 drm/edid: Implement DisplayID Type IX & X timing blocks parsing

On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, Egor Vorontsov <sdoregor@...re.me> wrote:
> The patchset seems stalled, presumably because of this CI dead end.
>
> Is there anything I can do about this issue, or did the thread just get
> lost? Some are even pinging me directly on the state of this now.

I'm sorry, totally my fault, I dropped the ball.

I resent the patches for fresh results [1], and will merge them via
drm-misc-next.

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1744708239.git.jani.nikula@intel.com



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel