[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490ab216-982e-4707-abe4-a5b8d0444458@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:13:02 +0530
From: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@...il.com>
To: rujra <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>, johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [FIRST-PATCH] staging : greybus : gb-beagleplay.c : fixing the
checks as first-patch
On 4/16/25 17:47, rujra wrote:
> added comments on spinlocks for producer-consumer model, rearranged the
> lines on function calls where it should not end with "(" this bracket,
> also removed white-spaces and aligned the arguments of function calls.
Are these manual adjustments, or using clang-format?
I do not care about formatting being "readable". As long as it can be
done by a tool like clang-format, that's fine with me.
Of course if you are fixing some checkpatch error, that is okay, but if
now, please avoid formatting changes.
The comments are fine. Although you probably want to add a space between
`//` and the sentence start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@...il.com>
>
>> 8------------------------------------------------------8<
> drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c b/drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c
> index 473ac3f2d382..fa1c3a40dd0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c
> +++ b/drivers/greybus/gb-beagleplay.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ struct gb_beagleplay {
> struct gb_host_device *gb_hd;
>
> struct work_struct tx_work;
> + //used to ensure that only one producer can access the shared
> resource at a time.
> spinlock_t tx_producer_lock;
> + //used to ensure that only one consumer can access the shared
> resource at a time.
> spinlock_t tx_consumer_lock;
> struct circ_buf tx_circ_buf;
> u16 tx_crc;
> @@ -642,8 +644,8 @@ static int cc1352_bootloader_wait_for_ack(struct
> gb_beagleplay *bg)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> - &bg->fwl_ack_com, msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&bg->fwl_ack_com,
> +
> msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> if (ret < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(&bg->sd->dev, ret,
> "Failed to acquire ack semaphore");
> @@ -680,9 +682,8 @@ static int cc1352_bootloader_get_status(struct
> gb_beagleplay *bg)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> - &bg->fwl_cmd_response_com,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&bg->fwl_cmd_response_com,
> +
> msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> if (ret < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(&bg->sd->dev, ret,
> "Failed to acquire last status semaphore");
> @@ -765,9 +766,8 @@ static int cc1352_bootloader_crc32(struct
> gb_beagleplay *bg, u32 *crc32)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> - &bg->fwl_cmd_response_com,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&bg->fwl_cmd_response_com,
> +
> msecs_to_jiffies(CC1352_BOOTLOADER_TIMEOUT));
> if (ret < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(&bg->sd->dev, ret,
> "Failed to acquire last status semaphore");
> --
> 2.43.0
Best Regards,
Ayush Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists