linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] lib/Kconfig.debug: introduce CONFIG_NO_AUTO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb713790-0b68-4d91-831c-b18fa1ea01a9@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:04:58 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: chenlinxuan@...ontech.com, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
 Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
 Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
 Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, Peter Huewe
 <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor
 <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
 Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
 llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Winston Wen <wentao@...ontech.com>,
 Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] lib/Kconfig.debug: introduce
 CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE

On 4/16/25 2:44 AM, Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay wrote:
> 2. Make it depends on X86 and LOONGARCH,
>     as I haven't test other architectures

That sounds weird to me. Shouldn't this option be made architecture-
independent?

> +config NO_AUTO_INLINE
> +	bool "Disable compiler auto-inline optimizations (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +	default n
> +	depends on CC_IS_GCC && (X86 || LOONGARCH)

Why "depends on CC_IS_GCC"? Please make sure that both gcc and clang are
supported.

Thanks,

Bart.