linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27d13454-280f-4966-b694-d7e58d991547@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:10:45 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Gavin Guo <gavinguo@...lia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: willy@...radead.org, ziy@...dia.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
 hughd@...gle.com, revest@...gle.com, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix dereferencing invalid pmd migration
 entry

On 14.04.25 09:27, Gavin Guo wrote:
> When migrating a THP, concurrent access to the PMD migration entry
> during a deferred split scan can lead to a page fault, as illustrated
> below. To prevent this page fault, it is necessary to check the PMD
> migration entry and return early. In this context, there is no need to
> use pmd_to_swp_entry and pfn_swap_entry_to_page to verify the equality
> of the target folio. Since the PMD migration entry is locked, it cannot
> be served as the target.
> 
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea60001db008
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2199114 Comm: tee Not tainted 6.14.0+ #4 NONE
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:split_huge_pmd_locked+0x3b5/0x2b60
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> try_to_migrate_one+0x28c/0x3730
> rmap_walk_anon+0x4f6/0x770
> unmap_folio+0x196/0x1f0
> split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x9f6/0x1560
> deferred_split_scan+0xac5/0x12a0
> shrinker_debugfs_scan_write+0x376/0x470
> full_proxy_write+0x15c/0x220
> vfs_write+0x2fc/0xcb0
> ksys_write+0x146/0x250
> do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x120
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> 
> The bug is found by syzkaller on an internal kernel, then confirmed on
> upstream.
> 
> Fixes: 84c3fc4e9c56 ("mm: thp: check pmd migration entry in common path")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavinguo@...lia.com>
> ---
>   mm/huge_memory.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 2a47682d1ab7..0cb9547dcff2 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3075,6 +3075,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>   			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>   {
> +	bool pmd_migration = is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd);
> +
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> @@ -3085,10 +3087,18 @@ void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>   	 * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
>   	 * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
>   	 */
> -	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> -	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> -		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> -			return;

Why not something like

struct folio *entry_folio;

if (folio) {	
	if (is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd))
		entry_folio = pfn_swap_entry_folio(pmd_to_swp_entry(*pmd)));
	else
		entry_folio = pmd_folio(*pmd));

	if (folio != entry_folio)
		return;
}


(can likely be cleaned up a bit by moving stuff into a separate function)


-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb