[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dd209b7-0c56-4782-880e-4642516dbf1b@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:55:59 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/fpu: Refactor xfeature bitmask update code for
sigframe XSAVE
On 4/16/2025 1:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> +static inline int set_xfeature_in_sigframe(struct xregs_state __user *xbuf, u64 mask)
>> +{
>> + u64 xfeatures;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* Read the xfeatures value already saved in the user buffer */
>> + err = __get_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
>> + xfeatures |= mask;
>> + err |= __put_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> For future reference, please put an extra newline before 'return'
> statements, so that the code looks more 'balanced':
>
>> +{
>> + u64 xfeatures;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* Read the xfeatures value already saved in the user buffer */
>> + err = __get_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
>> + xfeatures |= mask;
>> + err |= __put_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
I see. Thanks for the note.
> I've done that for this patch, so no need to resend it.
Thanks!
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists