linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] overflow: Clarify expectations for getting DEFINE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174483177863.740549.2239617505557790214.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:29:47 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] overflow: Clarify expectations for getting DEFINE_FLEX variable sizes

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:29:15 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Mention the use of __member_size() for DEFINE_FLEX variables as a hint
> for getting at the compile-time size of the resulting flexible array
> member.
> 
> 

Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!

[1/1] overflow: Clarify expectations for getting DEFINE_FLEX variable sizes
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2122b4571745

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook