lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250416-ublk_task_per_io-v5-4-9261ad7bff20@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:46:08 -0600
From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, 
 Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] ublk: mark ublk_queue as const for
 ublk_handle_need_get_data

We now allow multiple tasks to operate on I/Os belonging to the same
queue concurrently. This means that any writes to ublk_queue in the I/O
path are potential sources of data races. Try to prevent these by
marking ublk_queue pointers as const in ublk_handle_need_get_data. Also
move a bit more of the NEED_GET_DATA-specific logic into
ublk_handle_need_get_data, to make the pattern in __ublk_ch_uring_cmd
more uniform.

Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 215ab45b00e10150e58d7f5ea5b5d13e40a1aa79..5f9679c03305576bee586388cab82a6ea5472f8b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static void ublk_cmd_tw_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	ublk_dispatch_req(ubq, pdu->req, issue_flags);
 }
 
-static void ublk_queue_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *rq)
+static void ublk_queue_cmd(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *rq)
 {
 	struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = ubq->ios[rq->tag].cmd;
 	struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(cmd);
@@ -1813,15 +1813,6 @@ static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 	mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
 }
 
-static void ublk_handle_need_get_data(struct ublk_device *ub, int q_id,
-		int tag)
-{
-	struct ublk_queue *ubq = ublk_get_queue(ub, q_id);
-	struct request *req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[q_id], tag);
-
-	ublk_queue_cmd(ubq, req);
-}
-
 static inline int ublk_check_cmd_op(u32 cmd_op)
 {
 	u32 ioc_type = _IOC_TYPE(cmd_op);
@@ -1933,6 +1924,20 @@ static int ublk_commit_and_fetch(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int ublk_get_data(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
+			 struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+			 const struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd,
+			 struct request *req)
+{
+	if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, cmd, ub_cmd->addr);
+	ublk_queue_cmd(ubq, req);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 			       unsigned int issue_flags,
 			       const struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd)
@@ -2026,10 +2031,11 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 			goto out;
 		break;
 	case UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA:
-		if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+		ret = ublk_get_data(
+			ubq, io, cmd, ub_cmd,
+			blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ub_cmd->q_id], tag));
+		if (ret)
 			goto out;
-		ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, cmd, ub_cmd->addr);
-		ublk_handle_need_get_data(ub, ub_cmd->q_id, ub_cmd->tag);
 		break;
 	default:
 		goto out;

-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ