[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250416211530.GA3499099@ax162>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:15:30 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rheinsberg <david@...dahead.eu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>,
Mike Yuan <me@...dnzj.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Ziljstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pidfs: ensure consistent ENOENT/ESRCH reporting
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:21:02PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Ok, I think I understand how this happens. dbus-broker assumes that
> only EINVAL is reported by SO_PEERPIDFD when a process is reaped:
>
> https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/blob/5d34d91b138fc802a016aa68c093eb81ea31139c/src/util/sockopt.c#L241
>
> It would be great if it would also allow for ESRCH which is the correct
> error code anyway. So hopefully we'll get that fixed in userspace. For
> now we paper over this in the kernel in the SO_PEERPIDFD code.
>
> Can you please test vfs-6.16.pidfs again. It has the patch I'm
> appending.
Yes, that appears to work fine for me, thanks for the quick fix!
If it would be helpful:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists