[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dd9504c-4bce-4acd-874c-8eed8c311a2f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:16:26 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, kuniyu@...zon.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] udp: Add tracepoint for udp_sendmsg()
On 4/16/25 1:23 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index f9f5b92cf4b61..8c2902504a399 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1345,6 +1345,8 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> connected = 1;
> }
>
> + trace_udp_sendmsg_tp(sk, msg);
why `_tp` suffix? the usual naming is trace_${func}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists