linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: spmi: Add generic SPMI NVMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMT+MTSqdzg9pBCW0qB1KMK4t9w0-fM=vRowO0kWVNqK9GtBRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:39:54 +0200
From: Sasha Finkelstein <fnkl.kernel@...il.com>
To: Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com>
Cc: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, 
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>, Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>, 
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: spmi: Add generic SPMI NVMEM

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 02:18, Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com> wrote:
> Also, the PMIC definitely has more (mostly independent) functions than just non-volatile
> memory, so I am not sure if it is really appropriate to model it as only a nvmem device.

It is good enough for the PMICs that i am adding, there are no plans
to expose any
other features to the os.