linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf v2] ftrace: fix incorrect hash size in register_ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250415205539.5712e5c5@batman.local.home>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:55:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Menglong Dong
 <menglong8.dong@...il.com>, mark.rutland@....com,
 mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong
 <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] ftrace: fix incorrect hash size in
 register_ftrace_direct()

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:14:01 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:

> I'm a bit confused by the "[PATCH bpf]" prefix... This fix doesn't
> seem to be BPF-related, so I'm not sure why it would go through the
> bpf tree. I presume Masami or Steven will route it through their tree,
> is that right?

I can take this in my tree.

-- Steve