linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43qcktsp4ajqicfvpmcicpym47rbamrscs5oup5625xs6xxlxa@ztu46vm5dkyq>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:16:38 +0530
From: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>, 
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, 
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, 
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, 
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"m.felsch@...gutronix.de" <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, 
	GEO-CHHER-bsp-development <bsp-development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com>, "stefan.klug@...asonboard.com" <stefan.klug@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait"

On Apr 16, 2025 at 10:29:27 +0530, Jai Luthra wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> On Apr 15, 2025 at 18:52:39 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:47:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hi Catalin,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:42:22PM +0000, POPESCU Catalin wrote:
> > > > Hi Jai,
> > > > 
> > > > This issue was already reported by Stefan. The problem is that I don't 
> > > > have a Debix board to investigate.
> > > > The main difference b/w WFI and cpu-pd-wait is that the first doesn't 
> > > > call PSCI/TF-A. So, the issue looks to be related to some settings in 
> > > > the TF-A.
> > > 
> > > Jai, are you using mainline U-Boot and TF-A, or a downstream version of
> > > either (or both) ?
> 
> I am running mainline U-Boot 2024.01 (with cherry-picked Debix support) 
> and the same TF-A tag as you rel_imx_5.4.70_2.3.6
> 
> I can compile and test with U-Boot 2025.01, will report if it fixes the 
> issue on my setup.
> 

FYI, switching to U-Boot 2025.01 does *not* fix the issue on my setup.

I'm happy to test some other TF-A branch on my board if someone can 
point to it.

> > 
> > Actually, same question for Calatin :-)
> > 
> > I'm running mainline U-Boot 2025.01 and TF-A rel_imx_5.4.70_2.3.6 (from
> > https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-atf) and don't seem to experience the
> > issue:
> > 
> > # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/state1/disable
> > 0
> > 0
> > 0
> > 0
> > 
> > $ ping debix
> > PING debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.03 ms
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.800 ms
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.935 ms
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.902 ms
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.738 ms
> > 64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.939 ms
> > 
> > > > What I don't get is why I don't see this issue neither on our IMX8MP 
> > > > specific design nor on the EVK, which uses the same PHY as the Debix board.
> > > >
> > > > On 14/04/2025 14:07, Jai Luthra wrote:
> > > > > On Oct 21, 2024 at 17:42:34 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:44:24PM +0200, Catalin Popescu wrote:
> > > > >>> So far, only WFI is supported on i.MX8mp platform. Add support for
> > > > >>> deeper cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait" that would allow for better power
> > > > >>> usage during runtime. This is a port from NXP downstream kernel.
> > > > >>>
> > > > > Since the introduction of this patch in mainline, I am facing sluggish
> > > > > network performance with my Debix Model-A board with i.MX8mp SoC.
> > > > >
> > > > > The network latency jumps to >1s after almost every other packet:
> > > > >
> > > > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1008 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.488 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1025 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.810 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=590 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.351 ms
> > > > > ^C
> > > > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > > > 7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14.2857% packet loss, time 6126ms
> > > > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.351/437.416/1024.755/459.370 ms, pipe 2
> > > > > darkapex at freya in ~
> > > > >
> > > > > If I revert the patch, or disable the deeper cpuidle state through
> > > > > sysfs, the issue goes away.
> > > > >
> > > > > # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/cpuidle/state1/disable
> > > > >
> > > > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.482 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.28 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.26 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.848 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.406 ms
> > > > > ^C
> > > > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > > > 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4051ms
> > > > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.406/1.255/2.280/0.842 ms
> > > > >

-- 
Thanks,
Jai

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)