[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVbcOvfW6YqW6S77J7htaJqWkeoGEhjkAWXvG5Fo1FMhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:28:22 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] drm: renesas: rz-du: mipi_dsi: Add support for
RZ/V2H(P) SoC
Hi Prabhakar, Fabrizio,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 22:09, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Add DSI support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC.
>
> Co-developed-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -70,6 +80,18 @@ struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi {
> unsigned int num_data_lanes;
> unsigned int lanes;
> unsigned long mode_flags;
> +
> + struct rzv2h_dsi_mode_calc mode_calc;
> + struct rzv2h_plldsi_parameters dsi_parameters;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rzv2h_plldsi_div_limits rzv2h_plldsi_div_limits = {
> + .m = { .min = 64, .max = 1023 },
.max = 533?
> + .p = { .min = 1, .max = 4 },
> + .s = { .min = 0, .max = 5 },
.max = 6?
> + .k = { .min = -32768, .max = 32767 },
> + .csdiv = { .min = 1, .max = 1 },
> + .fvco = { .min = 1050 * MEGA, .max = 2100 * MEGA }
> };
Summarized: why do these values differ from the ones in the declaration
macro RZV2H_CPG_PLL_DSI_LIMITS(), i.e. why can't you use the latter?
>
> static inline struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi *
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists