linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V10 14/15] rust: opp: Extend OPP abstractions with cpufreq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250416104016.mkzyitdm4moz4qts@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:10:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 14/15] rust: opp: Extend OPP abstractions with
 cpufreq support

On 16-04-25, 12:31, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:59 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > +// Frequency table implementation.
> 
> ///
> 
> > +        // Returns a reference to the underlying [`cpufreq::Table`].
> 
> Ditto.

Hmm, I did not use /// as the comments were added to private
definitions.

Sorry for the dumb question, but why should we use /// in such cases ?
They will never show up in documentation anyway, right ?

-- 
viresh