[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d81e3e32-55f7-4764-aac8-ec959ae87175@rbox.co>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:32:44 +0200
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman
<eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for
sockmap/hashmap redirection
On 4/11/25 15:17, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:32:41PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> Test redirection logic. All supported and unsupported redirect combinations
>> are tested for success and failure respectively.
>> ...
>> + for (r = redirs; r < redirs + ARRAY_SIZE(redirs); r++) {
>> + enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>> + struct test_sockmap_listen *skel;
>
> Could we create a new BPF program file, such as test_sockmap_redir.c,
> instead of reusing existing ones? This file would be specifically
> dedicated to serving the sockmap_redir.c functionality.
>
> I understand there are already some duplicate programs, but isn’t this
> exactly the goal of our current work—to make the test examples more
> comprehensive and cleaner?
Sure, I get your point. I'll do that.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists