[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_2256A7C02F7849F1D89390E488704E826D06@qq.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:07:50 +0800
From: Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@...com>
To: rafael@...nel.org,
lukasz.luba@....com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4] PM: EM: Fix potential division-by-zero error in em_compute_costs()
From: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@...inos.cn>
When the device is of a non-CPU type, table[i].performance won't be
initialized in the previous em_init_performance(), resulting in division
by zero when calculating costs in em_compute_costs().
Since the 'cost' algorithm is only used for EAS energy efficiency
calculations and is currently not utilized by other device drivers, we
should add the _is_cpu_device(dev) check to prevent this division-by-zero
issue.
Fixes: 1b600da51073 ("PM: EM: Optimize em_cpu_energy() and remove division")
Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@...inos.cn>
---
kernel/power/energy_model.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index d9b7e2b38c7a..41606247c277 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ static int em_compute_costs(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table,
unsigned long prev_cost = ULONG_MAX;
int i, ret;
+ /* This is needed only for CPUs and EAS skip other devices */
+ if (!_is_cpu_device(dev))
+ return 0;
+
/* Compute the cost of each performance state. */
for (i = nr_states - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
unsigned long power_res, cost;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists