[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7950cbd5-d254-4e67-81fa-ab2194f9dbc4@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:15:21 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Petr Vaněk
<arkamar@...as.cz>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix _pgd_alloc() for Xen PV mode
On 4/17/25 07:48, Juergen Gross wrote:
> -#define PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER 1
> +#define PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER pgd_allocation_order
> +extern unsigned int pgd_allocation_order;
> #else
> #define PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER 0
> #endif
Instead of hiding a variable behind a macro-looking name and a bunch of
#ifdefs, can we please fix this properly?
static inline pgd_allocation_order(void)
{
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
return 1;
return 0;
}
and then s/PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER/pgd_allocation_order()/.
Wouldn't that be a billion times better?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists