[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174490310945.238609.8546371498324092542.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:48:29 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@....com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less
when interrupted"
On Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:24:19 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Several issues with this change:
>
> * The analysis is flawed and it's unclear what problem is being
> fixed. There is no difference between wait_event_freezable_timeout()
> and wait_event_timeout() with respect to device interrupts. And of
> course "the interrupt notifying the finish of an operation happens
> during wait_event_freezable_timeout()" -- that's how it's supposed
> to work.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] Revert "dmaengine: dmatest: Fix dmatest waiting less when interrupted"
commit: df180e65305f8c1e020d54bfc2132349fd693de1
Best regards,
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists